25-year-old murder conviction of two Detroit brothers tossed out

Julianne Cuneo, owner of Sunshine Investigations, and daughter of Roger and Martha Cuneo was one of two female investigators working on this project.  She is not the one the prosecutor erroneously hinted at some "hanky-panky".  It appears to me that the prosecutor is acting out the fox and the grapes of Aesop fame.

Photo

Photo by AP

By Jim Schaefer / Detroit Free Press  |   Friday, July 27, 2012  |  http://www.bostonherald.com  |  Midwest

DETROIT -- Raymond Highers, wearing bright yellow Wayne County Jail scrubs, folded his hands Thursday and clamped his eyes shut when it became clear what the judge was about to do.

 

“We have new evidence .” Wayne County Circuit Judge Lawrence Talon began.

 

Then the sniffling started, from one or two supporters in the back row of the packed courtroom on the sixth floor of the Frank Murphy Hall of Justice in downtown Detroit.

 

“ The court finds the newly discovered evidence to be credible and reliable.”

The room erupted in screams and applause before Talon could finish.

Raymond Highers and his brother, Thomas Highers, both imprisoned for a quarter-century for a murder they long maintained they did not commit, had just had their convictions wiped out.

 

And then, for the first time in the extraordinary hearing held off and on since March, Raymond Highers reached forward, shook his brother’s hand, and embraced him.

 

In a ruling from the bench that lasted about an hour, Talon said that new witnesses who never went to police about the shotgun slaying of Robert Karey, 65, offered enough new evidence during the hearing to erase the 1988 decision by then-Judge Terrance Boyle to convict the brothers and sentence them to life in prison.

 

Older brother Thomas is now 46. Raymond just turned the same age.

 

Talon said he didn’t buy the arguments of the prosecution that new witnesses discovered starting in 2009 were too inconsistent, unreliable and untrustworthy. And he outright dismissed suggestions that they had concocted their testimony to free the brothers.

 

Outside the courtroom, years of frustration over failed efforts to clear the men evolved into joy. The crowd in the courtroom flowed out into the hall, where people hugged and wept. “They’re coming home!” one woman shouted.

 

The men, for the weekend at least, remain in jail.

 

Talon had planned to rule Thursday on whether the brothers should be freed, but a fire alarm shortly after his decision caused a temporary evacuation of the building. The judge then put his decision off till Monday, when prosecutors are expected to argue the brothers should remain behind bars until an appeal of Talon’s ruling is decided. Prosecutors also could retry the men, should they so choose.

 

Michael Highers, 42, who lives in Monroe, said he hadn’t seen his brothers as free men since he was 17.

 

“It’s overwhelming,” he said through tears. “I just wish my mom would have been here to see it. . It’s the truth. It took 25 years to get here, but it’s the truth. .

 

“She knew that her boys didn’t do it. She went to her grave believing that.”

The Highers brothers’ mother died about five years ago.

 

“That was my mom’s mission. To get them out of there. I know that’s her up there, working OT.”

 

The rare hearing on the old murder case, which Talon conducted off and on for months amid other matters, featured testimony from the new witnesses and attempts by a prosecutor to knock down their accounts. Most of the Highers’ friends and family who were there for Thursday’s ruling had attended every session of the hearing.

 

Karey was shot and killed near the back door of the east side Detroit home from which he typically dealt marijuana to young suburban customers.

Boyle, who died in 2008, originally convicted the brothers in a non-jury trial, saying his verdict was a close call.

 

It was not until 2009 and a chance encounter on Facebook that information surfaced about a carload of 1987 Grosse Pointe North High School graduates who said they were at Karey’s house the night he was shot.

 

Four of those former classmates told Talon under oath what they remembered. Two of them testified they went to Karey’s back door to buy weed, but were interrupted by several armed black men who rushed into the backyard and ordered them to leave. One of those witnesses also testified he heard a gunshot as they fled back to the car. The race of the assailants is important because the Highers brothers are white.

 

The brothers’ lawyers said the witnesses never went to police for various reasons: fear for their safety, of being somehow linked to the killing or of their parents finding out where they were that night. Janet Napp, lawyer for Raymond Highers, said in court that the new witnesses were “just kids” at the time who hadn’t yet developed “a moral compass.”

 

Assistant Prosecutor Ana Quiroz questioned their credibility throughout the hearing, calling the new witnesses liars and suggesting there was a conspiracy to free the pair.

 

Quiroz provided no proof of a conspiracy, but said the scenario related by the new witnesses just didn’t add up. Among other things, she said, they described a chain link fence that didn’t exist, saw only one shotgun when two were used, and claimed to hear an exclamation - “Get the f out of here!” - that no witnesses in the original trial reported.

 

She also said that a private investigator who helped find the new witnesses may have planted details with them.

 

Evidence in the original trial established that the brothers, admitted drug users from the neighborhood, were desperate enough to rob and kill Karey, Quiroz said. She also pointed to one witness who identified Raymond Highers fleeing from the house with what looked like a shotgun, accompanied by another white man.

 

The Highers brothers’ lawyers argued that the witness actually saw the two previously unknown Grosse Pointe North graduates running away. Plus, the getaway car described at trial was never linked to the Highers brothers, but does match the car the graduates said they were in that night.

 

In the end, Talon sided with most of the defense arguments. He called the inconsistencies minor and said the witnesses would be less believable had their stories aligned perfectly. As for the suggestion that the witnesses conspired, compared notes and perhaps supplemented their memories with help from others, Talon said, “It’s human nature in a situation like this that these witnesses would do exactly what they did. Go to YouTube, read the paper, talk to one another, communicate on social media. The court isn’t overly bothered by that.

 

“Really, none of these witnesses, the court finds, had anything to gain by coming forward.”

 

Kevin Zieleniewski, a lawyer and former Detroiter who now lives near Washington, D.C., started the push to find the new witnesses in 2009 after he happened upon a Facebook posting about the Highers brothers being in prison. He grew up in that neighborhood, and the post reminded him of an old conversation about someone else killing Karey. Using his own money to travel to Detroit, Zieleniewski started digging, and was soon joined by lawyers and private investigators who found the new witnesses.

Valerie Newman, one of the brothers’ lawyers, said: “You know what amazes me? They never had any doubt that this day would come. Ray said that to me.”

 

And so on Thursday, three years after a chance encounter on Facebook, Zieleniewski stood quietly outside the courthouse, watching friends and family of the brothers celebrate.

 

“Thank God,” Zieleniewski said. “That’s all. Thank God.”

September 26, 2013 at 1:13 pm

Judge drops murder charges for Highers brothers



From The Detroit News:

 http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130926/METRO08/309260079#ixzz2g6t9hWhx

 

 

Raymond Highers, right, shares an emotional moment after having murder charges dropped in his case with his brother, Thomas.

Raymond Highers, right, shares an emotional moment after having murder charges dropped in his case with his brother, Thomas. (David Coates / The Detroit News)

Detroit — A Wayne County Circuit Court judge on Thursday dismissed murder charges for two brothers who spent most of their adult lives in prison, ending their more than quarter-century crusade of adamantly professing their innocence.

 

During a morning hearing, Judge Lawrence Talon approved Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy’s request to dismiss charges against Raymond, 47, and Thomas Highers, 48, stemming from their convictions in 1988.

 

“This has been a long journey for everybody involved in the case,” Talon said.

 

The Highers brothers were charged with felony murder in 1987 in addition to other charges — including assault with intent to murder — in connection with the homicide of 65-year-old Robert Karey, a known marijuana dealer at an alleged drug house in Detroit. They were convicted in 1988 following a trial before Wayne County Circuit Judge Terrance Boyle and served 25 years in prison.

 

Talon heavily reflected Thursday on the prosecutors involved in the case and its history over the years, making it a point to say he had a great amount of respect for all of the parties involved.

 

“No one is criticizing the role any of these people had,” he said.

Before handing down his ruling, Talon also ordered the 20 or so people in the court in support of the Highers brothers to refrain from displaying any outburst of emotion.

 

Wayne County Assistant Prosecutor Mike Reynolds told Talon the prosecution was seeking to drop the charges because some witnesses had died and other witnesses’ memories had faded over the years.

 

“We are requesting the court to dismiss the charges against the defendant(s),” Reynolds said.

 

The judge agreed, saying: "I realize that sometimes a case cannot be put back together after 26 years."

 

Talon, however, denied the defense lawyers' request to dismiss the case with prejudice. Should new evidence be presented to the court, a

new trial could be requested, defense lawyers warned.

 

Neither of the Highers brothers could wrap their minds around the possibilities for their futures. Both they're just happy to put the case behind them.

 

Once outside of the courtroom, the brothers shook the hands of perfect strangers who congratulated them for their victory in court. On the sidewalk in front of the Frank Murphy Hall of Justice, there was an air of celebration, with family members cheering and applauding for the Higherses.

 

Thomas Highers said Talon's ruling was to be expected. Although the brothers are now free without restrictions — they can now travel freely and their GPS tethers are expected to be removed Thursday — there will always remain the possibility someone else could come forward with new information, he said.

 

"In the last year, we haven't allowed it to hang over our heads," Thomas Highers said. "It's just unfortunate that he ruled the way he did."

 

The dismissal means the brothers can now apply for jobs that a felony conviction would have barred them from consideration. Currently, Raymond Highers has a job as a cooling and heating technician while Thomas Highers manages an apartment building in Metro Detroit.

Defense attorney Gabi Silver Silver said Thursday she had been in a hearing on Wednesday when she received a text from her office staff saying charges had been dismissed. She said the news came with disbelief.

 

"It's a good day to be a lawyer," said Silver as she and an entourage of loved ones walked to her law firm across the street following the hearing.

 

Silver also said the prosecutor’s office offered a plea agreement after the new evidence came to light, which would have freed the brothers on time served and saved them from having to go to trial.

 

“It’s a great offer for a guilty guy,” Silver said.

But her client, Thomas Highers, “looked me square in the eye” and turned down the plea.

 

Worthy in an announcement Wednesday said she was dropping all charges against the brothers, saying while she still believed the brothers were guilty, her office did not have a strong enough case to try them again because too much time has passed.

 

Talon on Thursday took exception to Worthy's comment made on Wednesday that justice was not done.

"I find it troubling that the prosecutor stated that justice was not done when each side had full opportunity to have their cases heard," Talon said.

 

Thursday’s decision will give the brothers time to focus on advocacy for the wrongfully convicted, their lawyers said. Attorney Valerie Newman said 28 states have legislation in place to compensate for the wrongfully accused. Michigan is not one of them.

 

Newman said state Sen. Steve Bieda, D-Warren, has introduced legislation to address that.

 

The Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation Act, introduced last year, would allow those wrongly convicted and imprisoned to bring action against the State in Court of Claims. Compensation would be up to $40,000 for each year from the date the plaintiff was imprisoned to the date that he or she was released from Department of Corrections custody.

 

Thirty-one people have been exonerated in Michigan since 1989, Bieda’s bill says, citing data compiled by the University of Michigan Law School and Northwestern Law School.

 

Since 2001, when a DNA post-conviction testing statute went into effect, three people have been exonerated by DNA, says The Innocence Project at Cooley Law School.

 

The brothers were freed last year while awaiting a new trial set for Oct.8.

 

In July 2012, Talon threw out the convictions against the brothers and granted them a motion for a new trial. A month later, Talon ordered the brothers retried and freed them on $10,000 bonds after new witness testimony suggested the brothers may have been misidentified in the murder of Karey.

 

One witness testified the attackers at the drug house were black. The Highers brothers are white.

 

A Facebook conversation about the shooting around three years ago sparked new legal efforts to revisit the brothers’ case.

 

David Moran, an attorney with the Michigan Innocence Clinic at the University of Michigan Law School, said the Highers brothers’ case illustrates just how shaky cases are that rely on witness identification.

 

“You’re talking about identifying from a distance of complete strangers,” said Moran, who represented the brothers briefly after the new evidence came to light.

Write a comment

Comments: 3
  • #1

    Eric (Wednesday, 08 August 2012 04:03)

    So the two guys will finish their lives in jail this year.

  • #2

    Martha Cuneo (Wednesday, 08 August 2012 23:34)

    Hi Eric. American law can be very confusing. We don't know right now how long the Highers' brothers will be in jail. It had been hoped that they would be released within a few days of the day when the Judge's decision was read, but that did not happen.

    The reason it did not happen is that the Prosecutor, who represents the interests of Michigan citizens, has said that she may ask to re-try the Highers' in this matter. If she does make that request, the Judge will decide whether there will be a second trial. If he says no, they will be released.

    If the Judge says there will be a second trial, then the Judge will decide whether they will be held until the end of the second trial, or whether they will be released and will only go back to jail if they are found guilty in the second trial.

    In general, justice in the 21st Century is not swift in U.S. criminal courts. It is thought that to be as sure of a proper outcome as possible, it is important to carefully consider all aspects of a case. That takes time.

    Maybe the Judge simply will not allow a second trial, in which case the Highers' brothers will go home soon. We just don't know right now.

    Best Personal Regards, Martha

  • #3

    new york city dui attorney (Monday, 17 December 2012 04:56)

    The caliber of collection that you are providing is but marvelous.

Fri

13

Nov

2015

Are Languages Products of their Environment?


shutterstock_222422665_151112


DISCOVER MAGAZINE published this very interesting article: 


  Languages Are Products of Their Environments


The characteristics that make each language unique may actually be adaptations to the acoustics of different environments.

2 Comments

Tue

03

Jun

2014

The Case for Reparations

 

The Case for Reparations

 

Two hundred fifty years of slavery. Ninety years of Jim Crow. Sixty years of separate but equal. Thirty-five years of racist housing policy. Until we reckon with our compounding moral debts, America will never be whole.

 

By Ta-Nehisi Coates

May 21, 2014

 


Chapters

  1. I. “So That’s Just One Of My Losses”
  2. II.  “A Difference of Kind, Not Degree”
  3. III. “We Inherit Our Ample Patrimony”
  4. IV. “The Ills That Slavery Frees Us From”
  5. V. The Quiet Plunder
  6. VI. Making The Second Ghetto
  7. VII. “A Lot Of People Fell By The Way”
  8. VIII. “Negro Poverty is not White Poverty”
  9. IX. Toward A New Country
  10. X. “There Will Be No ‘Reparations’ From Germany”
0 Comments

Mon

02

Jun

2014

A Look At 19th Century Children In The USA

PHILADELPHIA — DINNER with your children in 19th-century America often required some self-control. Berry stains in your daughter’s hair? Good for her. Raccoon bites running up your boy’s arms? Bet he had an interesting day.

 

As this year’s summer vacation begins, many parents contemplate how to rein in their kids. But there was a time when Americans pushed in the opposite direction, preserved in Mark Twain’s cat-swinging scamps. Parents back then encouraged kids to get some wildness out of their system, to express the republic’s revolutionary values.

The New York Times

Sunday Review

By JON GRINSPAN MAY 31, 2014

 

A late 19th century family taking a stroll down a set of railroad tracks
A late 19th century family taking a stroll down a set of railroad tracks

American children of the 19th century had a reputation. Returning British visitors reported on American kids who showed no respect, who swore and fought, who appeared — at age 10 — “calling for liquor at the bar, or puffing a cigar in the streets,” as one wrote. There were really no children in 19th-century America, travelers often claimed, only “small stuck-up caricatures of men and women.”

 

This was not a “carefree” nation, too rough-hewed to teach proper manners; adults deliberately chose to express new values by raising “go-ahead” boys and girls. The result mixed democracy and mob rule, assertiveness and cruelty, sudden freedom and strict boundaries. Visitors noted how American fathers would brag that their disobedient children were actually “young republicans,” liberated from old hierarchies. Children were still expected to be deferential to elders, but many were trained to embody their nation’s revolutionary virtues. “The theory of the equality” was present at the ballot box, according to one sympathetic Englishman, but “rampant in the nursery.”

 

Boys, in particular, spent their childhoods in a rowdy outdoor subculture. After age 5 or so they needed little attention from their mothers, but were not big enough to help their fathers work. So until age 10 or 12 they spent much of their time playing or fighting.

 

The writer William Dean Howells recalled his ordinary, violent Ohio childhood, immersed in his loose gang of pals, rarely catching a “glimpse of life much higher than the middle of a man.” Howells’s peers were “always stoning something,” whether friends, rivals or stray dogs. They left a trail of maimed animals behind them, often hurt in sloppy attempts to domesticate wild pets.

 

And though we envision innocents playing with a hoop and a stick, many preferred “mumbletypeg” — a game where two players competed to see who could throw a knife closer to his own foot. Stabbing yourself meant a win by default.

 

Left to their own devices, boys learned an assertive style that shaped their futures. The story of every 19th-century empire builder — Carnegie, Rockefeller, Vanderbilt — seems to begin with a striving 10-year-old. “Boy culture” offered training for the challenges of American manhood and a reprieve before a life of labor.

 

But these unsupervised boys also formed gangs that harassed the mentally ill, the handicapped and racial and ethnic minorities. Boys played an outsize role in the anti-Irish pogroms in 1840s Philadelphia, the brutal New York City draft riots targeting African-Americans during the Civil War and attacks on Chinese laborers in Gilded Age California. These children did not invent the bigotry rampant in white America, but their unrestrained upbringing let them enact what their parents mostly muttered.

 

Their sisters followed a different path. Girls were usually assigned more of their mothers’ tasks. An 8-year-old girl would be expected to help with the wash or other physically demanding tasks, while her brother might simply be too small, too slow or too annoying to drive the plow with his father. But despite their drudgery, 19th-century American girls still found time for tree climbing, bonfire building and waterfall-jumping antics. There were few pretty pink princesses in 19th-century America: Girls were too rowdy and too republican for that.

 

So how did we get from “democratic sucklings” to helicopter parents? Though many point to a rise of parental worrying after the 1970s, this was an incremental change in a movement that began a hundred years earlier.

 

In the last quarter of the 19th century, middle-class parents launched a self-conscious project to protect children. Urban professionals began to focus on children’s vulnerabilities. Well-to-do worriers no longer needed to raise tough dairymaids or cunning newsboys; the changing economy demanded careful managers of businesses or households, and restrained company men, capable of navigating big institutions.

 

Demographics played a role as well: By 1900 American women had half as many children as they did in 1800, and those children were twice as likely to live through infancy as they were in 1850. Ironically, as their children faced fewer dangers, parents worried more about their protection.

 

Instead of seeing boys and girls as capable, clever, knockabout scamps, many reconceived children as vulnerable, weak and naïve. Reformers introduced child labor laws, divided kids by age in school and monitored their play. Jane Addams particularly worked to fit children into the new industrial order, condemning “this stupid experiment of organizing work and failing to organize play.”

 

There was good reason to tame the boys and girls of the 19th century, if only for stray cats’ sake. But somewhere between Jane Addams and Nancy Grace, Americans lost track of their larger goal. Earlier parents raised their kids to express values their society trumpeted.

 

“Precocious” 19th-century troublemakers asserted their parents’ democratic beliefs and fit into an economy that had little use for 8-year-olds but idealized striving, self-made men. Reformers designed their Boy Scouts to meet the demands of the 20th century, teaching organization and rebalancing the relationship between play and work. Both movements agreed, in their didactic ways, that playtime shaped future citizens.

 

Does the overprotected child articulate values we are proud of in 2014? Nothing is easier than judging other peoples’ parenting, but there is a side of contemporary American culture — fearful, litigious, controlling — that we do not brag about but that we reveal in our child rearing, and that runs contrary to our self-image as an open, optimistic nation. Maybe this is why sheltering parents come in for so much easy criticism: A visit to the playground exposes traits we would rather not recognize.

 

There is, however, a saving grace that parents will notice this summer. Kids are harder to guide and shape, as William Dean Howells put it, “than grown people are apt to think.” It is as true today as it was two centuries ago: “Everywhere and always the world of boys is outside of the laws that govern grown-up communities.” Somehow, they’ll manage to go their own way.

 

________________________________

 

A National Endowment for the Humanities fellow at the Massachusetts Historical Society who is writing a book on the role of young people in 19th-century American democracy.

0 Comments

Mon

21

Apr

2014

Investigating Family's Wealth, China's Leader Signals a Change

From The New York Times 

By CHRISTOPHER DREW and JAD MOUAWAD

APRIL 19, 2014

 

HONG KONG — His son landed contracts to sell equipment to state oil fields and thousands of filling stations across China. His son’s mother-in-law held stakes in pipelines and natural gas pumps from Sichuan Province in the west to the southern isle of Hainan. And his sister-in-law, working from one of Beijing’s most prestigious office buildings, invested in mines, property and energy projects.

 

In thousands of pages of corporate documents describing these ventures, the name that never appears is his own: Zhou Yongkang, the formidable Chinese Communist Party leader who served as China’s top security official and the de facto boss of its oil industry.





A visitor at the Zhou family's ancestral graves in Xiqliantou, eastern China.  Intrigue surrounds the family after a spate of arrests.  Sim Chi Yim for the New York Times
A visitor at the Zhou family's ancestral graves in Xiqliantou, eastern China. Intrigue surrounds the family after a spate of arrests. Sim Chi Yim for the New York Times

But President Xi Jinping has targeted Mr. Zhou in an extraordinary corruption inquiry, a first for a Chinese party leader of Mr. Zhou’s rank, and put his family’s extensive business interests in the cross hairs.

 

Even by the cutthroat standards of Chinese politics, it is a bold maneuver. The finances of the families of senior leaders are among the deepest and most politically delicate secrets in China. The party has for years followed a tacit rule that relatives of the elite could prosper from the country’s economic opening, which rewarded loyalty and helped avert rifts in the leadership.

Zhou Family Ties

1 Comments

Fri

13

Nov

2015

Are Languages Products of their Environment?


shutterstock_222422665_151112


DISCOVER MAGAZINE published this very interesting article: 


  Languages Are Products of Their Environments


The characteristics that make each language unique may actually be adaptations to the acoustics of different environments.

2 Comments

Tue

03

Jun

2014

The Case for Reparations

 

The Case for Reparations

 

Two hundred fifty years of slavery. Ninety years of Jim Crow. Sixty years of separate but equal. Thirty-five years of racist housing policy. Until we reckon with our compounding moral debts, America will never be whole.

 

By Ta-Nehisi Coates

May 21, 2014

 


Chapters

  1. I. “So That’s Just One Of My Losses”
  2. II.  “A Difference of Kind, Not Degree”
  3. III. “We Inherit Our Ample Patrimony”
  4. IV. “The Ills That Slavery Frees Us From”
  5. V. The Quiet Plunder
  6. VI. Making The Second Ghetto
  7. VII. “A Lot Of People Fell By The Way”
  8. VIII. “Negro Poverty is not White Poverty”
  9. IX. Toward A New Country
  10. X. “There Will Be No ‘Reparations’ From Germany”
0 Comments

Mon

02

Jun

2014

A Look At 19th Century Children In The USA

PHILADELPHIA — DINNER with your children in 19th-century America often required some self-control. Berry stains in your daughter’s hair? Good for her. Raccoon bites running up your boy’s arms? Bet he had an interesting day.

 

As this year’s summer vacation begins, many parents contemplate how to rein in their kids. But there was a time when Americans pushed in the opposite direction, preserved in Mark Twain’s cat-swinging scamps. Parents back then encouraged kids to get some wildness out of their system, to express the republic’s revolutionary values.

The New York Times

Sunday Review

By JON GRINSPAN MAY 31, 2014

 

A late 19th century family taking a stroll down a set of railroad tracks
A late 19th century family taking a stroll down a set of railroad tracks

Read More 0 Comments

Mon

21

Apr

2014

Investigating Family's Wealth, China's Leader Signals a Change

From The New York Times 

By CHRISTOPHER DREW and JAD MOUAWAD

APRIL 19, 2014

 

HONG KONG — His son landed contracts to sell equipment to state oil fields and thousands of filling stations across China. His son’s mother-in-law held stakes in pipelines and natural gas pumps from Sichuan Province in the west to the southern isle of Hainan. And his sister-in-law, working from one of Beijing’s most prestigious office buildings, invested in mines, property and energy projects.

 

In thousands of pages of corporate documents describing these ventures, the name that never appears is his own: Zhou Yongkang, the formidable Chinese Communist Party leader who served as China’s top security official and the de facto boss of its oil industry.





A visitor at the Zhou family's ancestral graves in Xiqliantou, eastern China.  Intrigue surrounds the family after a spate of arrests.  Sim Chi Yim for the New York Times
A visitor at the Zhou family's ancestral graves in Xiqliantou, eastern China. Intrigue surrounds the family after a spate of arrests. Sim Chi Yim for the New York Times

Read More 1 Comments